Skip to content

How is the Capital Requirements Regulation different from the Investment Firms Regulation?

    The CRR/CRD framework applies primarily to credit institutions and systemically important investment firms (Class 1 under IFR). It imposes minimum capital requirements, supervisory reviews, and transparency obligations, along with liquidity rules such as the LCR and NSFR. Large EU banks or systemic broker-dealers typically use this framework. 

    In contrast, the IFR/IFD framework applies to non-systemic investment firms (Classes 2 and 3), with capital requirements based on specific risk-based K-factors (like RtF, RtC, and RtM). It simplifies obligations for smaller firms and does not impose liquidity ratios, making it more suitable for entities like Malta-licensed CFD brokers or asset managers.

    How do they interact?

    (a) Firm Classification

    Firm TypeRegimeCriteria
    Banks & systemic firmsCRR/CRDAsset threshold (>€30B) or banking license.
    Non-systemic investment firmsIFR/IFDK-factors determine Class 2 or 3.

    (b) Overlaps & Exemptions

    • Class 1 firms (under IFR) fall back into CRR/CRD.
    • Class 2/3 firms follow IFR/IFD but must still comply with MiFID II conduct rules.
    • CRR Lite: IFR simplifies capital rules for small firms (e.g., no FRTB for Class 3).

    (c) Key Differences

    FeatureCRR/CRDIFR/IFD
    ScopeBanks, systemic firmsNon-systemic investment firms
    Capital RulesComplex (Pillar 1-3)K-factor-based
    LiquidityLCR, NSFR requiredNo liquidity ratios
    ReportingCOREP, FINREPSimplified (IFR reporting)

    Under the EU’s regulatory landscape, investment firms begin under the IFR/IFD regime—but if they grow beyond €30 billion in assets and become systemically important, they transition to the more rigorous CRR/CRD framework. Banks, on the other hand, are always governed by CRR/CRD rules, even when operating investment arms. For smaller firms, the IFR/IFD offers a clear advantage: lower compliance costs and a more streamlined regulatory approach. Understanding this distinction is key for firms navigating growth and regulatory change.

    Please contact us for more information and guidance.